Jump to navigation. One of the criticisms raised against the historic validity of Jesus, His crucifixion, and resurrection is that after Jesus’ time that legend crept into the stories about Him and corrupted the true accounts of His life. If that is so, then the earlier we can find information concerning the fundamental events of Christ’s crucifixion, the less likely error and legend would have crept into the story and the more believable it will be. A creed is a statement of belief. In 1 Cor. It reads,. If we were to take a chronological look at some important events and their dates related to this subject, we find that the time period between the event and the record is very small. If the Crucifixion was in 30 A. That is a very short period of time and hardly long enough for legend to creep in and corrupt the story. This is especially important since the apostles were alive and spoke with Paul.
Dating 1 Corinthians 15
Author: 1 Corinthians identifies the author of the Book of 1 Corinthians as the apostle Paul. Purpose of Writing: The apostle Paul founded the church in Corinth. A few years after leaving the church, the apostle Paul heard some disturbing reports about the Corinthian church. They were full of pride and were excusing sexual immorality. Spiritual gifts were being used improperly, and there was rampant misunderstanding of key Christian doctrines.
Bad company corrupts good character (1 Corinthians ). Far too often, Christian young people and Christian singles date and marry people.
It usually amounts to something like this:. I keep hearing Christian apologists insisting the Corinthian Creed 1 Cor. Can you direct me to a solid refutation of that claim? The answer is no. In fact the evidence for this creed dating to the very origin of the religion is amply strong; and there is no reasonable basis for claiming otherwise. Yes, Paul added at least one line verse 8, appending his own conversion years later to the original. For the evidence, arguments, and quotations of even liberal scholars concurring, see BeliefMap.
More arguments come from Evangelicals who get some things wrong, but not everything. In that link, they count four arguments as five though the one argument they repeat twice, about the creed being un-Pauline, is correct , and repeat dubious apologetic tropes, e. OHJ , p. By contrast, arguments that the whole creed was interpolated e. Price makes the best attempt in The Empty Tomb , pp. Or they rest on false claims.
Though verses are likely original to the very dawn of the sect, verses 6 and 7 remain questionable, and yet apologists desperately need verse 6 to have been in the original.
1 Corinthians: a study guide
Jump to navigation. The following is a detailed paper that I wrote on the pre-Pauline creed in 1 Corinthians , specifically verses The earliest available Christian texts are the letters of the apostle Paul. Scholars date his epistles from approximately 50 to 60 C. Therefore, many individuals think that there is at least a twenty year gap between the death of Christ and the earliest Christian writings.
However, most do not realize that the epistles of Paul contain creedal summaries of early Christian beliefs which possibly date as early as C.
20– What about Dating? Larry M. 1. What If I Come from a Family That’s Not Perfect? Can I Still Have a Strong Family in the Future?
Habermas is interested in trends underlying the various branches of NT scholarship. He prefers to use source material which conservatives and liberals agree on. His approach has been termed the minimal facts apologetic. The majority of his resurrection apologetic uses criteria and argumentation developed by skeptics. With regards to authorship, 1 Corinthians is almost universally acknowledged to be authentic Pauline material.
In fact, if the gist of I Cor. The deal with these early creeds is pretty interesting. Scholars claim these to be echoes of what the earliest Christian preaching sounded like. So what we have in 1 Cor 3For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received : After the colon we get the creedal statement…. So when did Paul hear this material? The consensus among critics is that Paul received this material around 35 AD.
His conversion is dated at roughly 32 AD, with 3 years passing before he visits the apostles Galatians , from Peter and James. Scholars on both sides have no quarrels with that. Before giving it to Paul, where did Peter and James get it from?
David Guzik :: Study Guide for 1 Corinthians 15
Image by abcdz via Flickr. Gary Habermas comments on the very early date of this creed, which even skeptical scholars acknowledge. Do critical scholars agree on the date of this pre-Pauline creed? An increasing number of exceptionally influential scholars have very recently concluded that at least the teaching of the resurrection, and perhaps even the specific formulation of the pre-Pauline creedal tradition in 1 Corinthians , dates to AD 30!
No less a scholar than James D.
Dodd wrote, “We have here a solid body of evidence from a date close to the In 1 Corinthians 15, Paul starts the chapter by saying that he wants to remind.
Thanks for this post. I really appreciate the quality of your writing and the well researched support for these ideas. Post a Comment. Talking out of Buridan’s ass. Monday, February 23, 1 Corinthians This is an essay I wrote for my MA in theology. It should be noted that there is not an original thought in it, and it is significantly dependent on the works of William Lane Craig ; many of my references are his, and I just looked them up to make sure he got the quote right.
In 1 Corinthians 15, the apostle Paul exhorts the fledgling Corinthian church to hold fast “to the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also you stand, by which also you are saved. This creed cites that Jesus was killed to atone for our sins, that his corpse was buried, and that he then rose from the dead.
1 Corinthians 15: the earliest source for the basic facts about the life of Jesus
How do you explain the rise of these two appearance traditions? What are the grounds for that??? All we know is that this was a creed that Paul preached to the Corinthians at some point. In any event, there is zero evidence that the Twelve used this creed. Is there any chance you could do a post dedicated to why an early dating of this is unfounded, or perhaps point to someone who has done so? But what is the evidence?
I want to draw your attention to what Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians so that you can see what happens when you forget the resurrection.
An understanding of historical background is essential in the interpretation of any document, biblical or otherwise. The degree of significance is determined by the extent to which the document deals with the specific problems of a particular situation. Consequently, this factor plays a larger role in the interpretation of some books of the New Testament than it does in others.
Romans is one of those books where an understanding of historical background is essential, but not to the extent that it is in others. In Romans Paul is writing to a church which he did not establish and which he had not visited at the time of writing. As a result, the teaching here is the closest thing that Paul ever wrote to a summary of Christian doctrine, and there is less reference to local problems.
However, Paul was intimately involved with the church in Corinth. He had led in its establishment, had kept in close touch with it, and was now writing in the face of pressing needs. A thorough knowledge of the circumstances which preceded and called forth this book is essential to its interpretation. Ancient Corinth had headed the Achaean League during the Hellenistic period.
This city was completely destroyed by the Roman L. Mummius Achaicus in B. A century passed before it was finally rebuilt, probably under the direction of Julius Caesar. The city lay on a narrow strip of land between the Corinthian Gulf and the Saronic Gulf, and this strategic location insured the commercial prosperity of the city.
1 Cor. 15:3-4 demonstrates a creed too early for legend to corrupt.
What does the Bible say about? So flee youthful passions and pursue righteousness, faith, love, and peace, along with those who call on the Lord from a pure heart. Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness?
Paul rests the truth of Christianity on the historicity of the resurrection (1 Corinthians ). Paul also gives historical details about Jesus’ contemporaries.
In 1 Corinthians , Paul quotes a pre-existing creedal statement. Did this creedal statement originate at a very early time, something like within AD or AD ? Needless to say, Paul’s addition in verses 6b and 8 were not part of the creed. The strong majority of historians acknowledge that the creed dates back to AD On the assumption that Jesus died about 30 C. He would have needed to be informed of precedents in order to make sense of what had happened to him. More likely he indicates the importance of the tradition to himself from the start; that was why he made sure to pass it on to the Corinthians when they first believed
An Analysis of the Pre-Pauline Creed in 1 Corinthians 15:1-11
Almost all historians accept this creed as dating back to within 5 years of the death of Jesus. But why? After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born.
The letters collected in 2 Corinthians allow us to see that 1 Corinthians did other than some arguments about the place of 1 Corinthians 15 in the letter, most scholars century CE but including sources that date to the second century CE),.
Posted Feb. Tagged No tags. As historians evaluate the sources available for the resurrection of Jesus, a critical question is the dating of the sources. And the best relevant evidence, all things being equal, is evidence which is most nearly immediate to the event itself. Given the emphasis on education in the synagogue, the home, and the elementary school, it is not surprising that it was possible for the Jewish people to recount large quantities of material that was even far greater than the Gospels themselves.
Therefore, it appears that the Gospel was first spread in the form of oral creeds and hymns Luke ; Acts , ; ; ; ; ; ; Rom. Just look at the following passages:.